The City’s police oversight commission will consider a sweeping set of restrictions on the future use of drones by the City’s police department, outlining strict guardrails on surveillance, privacy and accountability before the technology is adopted.
The Community Police Oversight Commission is scheduled to review recommendations on April 9 from an ad hoc committee that developed a framework governing how unmanned aircraft systems could be used by the City’s police department.
The recommendations would limit drone deployments to clearly defined public safety purposes, barring their use for generalized surveillance, routine patrol or roving monitoring of neighborhoods.
“Each drone deployment must have a clearly stated purpose,” the report states, adding that use should be tied to specific incidents such as calls for service or other first-responder needs.
The department does not currently use drones and has not adopted a formal policy, but officials have expressed interest in acquiring the technology.
The commission’s proposal is intended to shape that policy in advance, highlighting transparency, oversight and community trust.
Among the most significant provisions is a ban on weaponized drones and a prohibition on the use of facial recognition or other biometric identification technologies, which the committee said pose heightened risks to privacy and civil liberties.
The framework places heavy emphasis on privacy protections, including minimizing the collection of data unrelated to an authorized deployment and restricting the monitoring of constitutionally protected activities such as protests, assemblies or other forms of free expression.
It also calls for heightened safeguards when drones are used near sensitive locations such as schools or hospitals, and urges the department to consider how operations could affect bystanders and private spaces.
In addition, the proposal outlines strict data security requirements, including limits on who can access drone-generated footage, how long that data can be retained and under what circumstances it can be shared with other agencies, including federal authorities.
Oversight and accountability are also central to the recommendations. The framework calls for regular audits, periodic policy reviews and public reporting to ensure compliance with state laws governing police technology and to allow elected officials to evaluate whether the program should continue.
The committee also recommends police clearly mark drones as law enforcement equipment and engage the community before launching any program, including outreach to explain how the technology would be used.
Commissioners further stressed that any future drone program must demonstrate a clear public safety benefit, such as improving response times or assisting in emergency situations, rather than being deployed simply because the technology is available.
The recommendations were developed over several months by a committee that reviewed policies from other jurisdictions and worked with the City’s independent police auditor to identify best practices and community concerns.
The commission is expected to discuss the proposal as part of a broader effort to establish policies for emerging law enforcement technologies before they are implemented, signaling a proactive approach to balancing public safety with civil liberties.
Get our daily Pasadena newspaper in your email box. Free.
Get all the latest Pasadena news, more than 10 fresh stories daily, 7 days a week at 7 a.m.
